majority decision by a person? Mark Hatter, a member of the Aarau Population Council, acting on behalf of the Greens Aarau-tube position on the vote of 13 June 2010, when it comes to changing the zoning in order Torfeld South. They had "decided after extensive discussion [...] with a clear majority to reject the draft in writing Hatter. Furthermore, a 
tripartite sweeping blow against the city government follows. If you visit the Green Party website confirmed the suspicion, that Hatton is on its own. 
Torfeld That the South in its present form in no way is worth preserving, it is about to ploitisch in Aarau agree. Several polls have shown that two thirds of Aarauerinnen Aarau and on a revaluation of the former industrial area are interested. This has a minority in the city parliament but not prevented from forcing a new vote in a referendum about the future use of the "South Torfeld. Meanwhile, have in recent days, Green Liberals, Christian Democrats, the FDP and Pro Aarau again clearly expressed for the submission and approval will be recommended to the voters unanimously to change the Land Use (BNO) to accept. Change that would allow a further consequence of the construction of a new football stadium for FC Aarau.
Picture: Mark Hatter said ER Aarau
Even Green Yes basically say While the Green Liberals Yes, but security expected in a relegation of FC Aarau, the Green Party Aarau-tube obtained equal to a multiple-page Round envelope. The author of the article is Mark Hatter, green Einwohnerrat the town of Aarau. In the press release written by him, he called the city government as "uncritical and naive" and accusing the City Council have done before "false promise" to. Next the author criticizes it continue to exist no plans on the integration of the new quarter to the rest of the city and other needs, "said Hatter, would" sacrifice ". However, it is not clear from the document, which victims must be provided there - possibly meet the needs of the current temporary users are meant to have taken lodgings at very favorable conditions in the dilapidated buildings.
However: If you read the press release through and you can visit the website of the Open Aarau-tube, one will not escape the impression that the letter coincided far not in all respects with the views the Greens. "Two Greens say yes to Torfeld South. These are Susanne Klaus Günthart and Daniel Schneider, both in per-Committee BNO Torfeld South" can be quoted against Marc Duke on this blog. Duke is a fan of FC Aarau and is active in his spare time for the vote campaign by he does public relations. "
I am very sorry that is the part of the opposition is still trying to untrue statements, to fight the project even though they themselves appeal to fairness. "
lie? In fact, says Hatter numbers and alleged facts that can not be proven. Pair it in the Communiqué Green terms such as "probable" and "probably" with
"totally irresponsible" and "not fair". doubt about the Party ternal support also come on when you take a look at the cause list of the Greens. Publicly available as the list of participants is the
Fraktionsssitzung 29 April 2010 / see screenshot). According to this list must be Mark Hatton all night talking to himself - for he was the only participant. His party colleagues have either up or unreported. Hatter has the press release written about on your own? If by "extensive discussions" and "clear majority" of the speech is important in such decisions shall take part even a single person?
Image: Screenshot List of participants Group meeting
Since 8 Meanwhile, May is the website of the Pro-
Committee BNO Torfeld South online. By acting refreshment slogan "Aarau unfolds" wants to turn away from the gloomy picture of the dilapidated neighborhood, and work with an open hand for a lively neighborhood. That it needs for a prosperous future, however, a "yes" at the ballot box is not disputed. With a No, that would Torfeld South for many years what it is today: a former industrial site and illegal waste disposal site.
Image: Torfeld South as landfill
will, however, denied that the collection of these signatures are not always the truth was told. So we have learned that it was alleged in the collection, all houses in Torfeld would be demolished and was also alleged that the tax rate go up, assuming 10 percent. Some passers-by will have heard, was asked to: "Are they against congestion in Aarau? Then sign here. " In such machinations somehow turns a stomach and it is hoped that can not be too many voters and women voters of this deception blinding. 
Yes to the BNO is not a quick shot. The many projects are planned well in advance, they are broadly supported and found participation in all processes broad international support. 
Torfeld That the South in its present form in no way is worth preserving, it is about to ploitisch in Aarau agree. Several polls have shown that two thirds of Aarauerinnen Aarau and on a revaluation of the former industrial area are interested. This has a minority in the city parliament but not prevented from forcing a new vote in a referendum about the future use of the "South Torfeld. Meanwhile, have in recent days, Green Liberals, Christian Democrats, the FDP and Pro Aarau again clearly expressed for the submission and approval will be recommended to the voters unanimously to change the Land Use (BNO) to accept. Change that would allow a further consequence of the construction of a new football stadium for FC Aarau. 
lie? In fact, says Hatter numbers and alleged facts that can not be proven. Pair it in the Communiqué Green terms such as "probable" and "probably" with "totally irresponsible" and "not fair". doubt about the Party ternal support also come on when you take a look at the cause list of the Greens. Publicly available as the list of participants is the Fraktionsssitzung 29 April 2010 / see screenshot). According to this list must be Mark Hatton all night talking to himself - for he was the only participant. His party colleagues have either up or unreported. Hatter has the press release written about on your own? If by "extensive discussions" and "clear majority" of the speech is important in such decisions shall take part even a single person? 
Image: Torfeld South as landfill 
